Collatz Map Basics

4.6 More Paradoxical Sequences

Lemma 146

Let \(j, n \in \mathbb {N}\) with \(n {\gt} 0\). If the pair \((j, n)\) is paradoxical, then:

\begin{equation} 0 {\lt} 1 - C(j, n) \le \frac{E(j, n)}{n}. \end{equation}
18

Proof

From the paradoxical condition \(C(j, n) {\lt} 1\), we get \(0 {\lt} 1 - C(j, n)\). By Lemma 109, \(T^j(n) = C(j, n) \cdot n + E(j, n)\). The paradoxical condition \(T^j(n) \ge n\) therefore gives \(C(j,n) \cdot n + E(j,n) \ge n\), hence \(E(j,n) \ge (1 - C(j,n)) \cdot n\), and dividing by \(n {\gt} 0\) yields the result.

Lemma 147

Let \(j, n, m \in \mathbb {N}\) with \(m {\gt} 0\). Suppose that every odd iterate \(T^k(n)\) with \(k {\lt} j\) satisfies \(T^k(n) \ge m\). Let \(q = \mathit{q}(j, n)\) be the number of odd steps in the first \(j\) iterations. Then:

\begin{equation} T^j(n) \le \frac{n \cdot \left(3 + \frac{1}{m}\right)^q}{2^j}. \end{equation}
19

Proof

By induction on \(j\). The base case \(j = 0\) is trivial.

For the inductive step, assume the bound holds for \(j\). We consider two cases depending on the parity of \(T^j(n)\):

Odd case (\(X(T^j(n)) = 1\)): By definition,

\begin{equation} T^{j+1}(n) = T(T^j(n)) \le T^j(n) \cdot \frac{3 + 1/m}{2}. \end{equation}
20

Combining with the inductive hypothesis \(T^j(n) \le n(3 + 1/m)^q/2^j\) and using \(q_{\text{new}} = q + 1\):

\begin{equation} T^{j+1}(n) \le \frac{n(3+1/m)^q}{2^j} \cdot \frac{3+1/m}{2} = \frac{n(3+1/m)^{q+1}}{2^{j+1}}. \end{equation}
21

Even case (\(X(T^j(n)) = 0\)): By definition, \(T^{j+1}(n) = T^j(n)/2\). Since \(q\) stays the same,

\begin{equation} T^{j+1}(n) \le \frac{n(3+1/m)^q}{2^j \cdot 2} = \frac{n(3+1/m)^q}{2^{j+1}}. \qedhere \end{equation}
22

Under the same hypotheses as Lemma 147, we have:

\begin{equation} \frac{E(j, n)}{n} \le \frac{\left(3 + \frac{1}{m}\right)^q - 3^q}{2^j}. \end{equation}
23

Proof

By Lemma 147:

\begin{equation} T^j(n) \le \frac{n(3+1/m)^q}{2^j}. \end{equation}
24

Substituting the factored form \(T^j(n) = C(j,n) \cdot n + E(j,n)\) from Lemma 109 and dividing through by \(n {\gt} 0\):

\begin{equation} C(j,n) + \frac{E(j,n)}{n} \le \frac{(3+1/m)^q}{2^j}. \end{equation}
25

Since \(C(j, n) = 3^q / 2^j\), rearranging gives the result.

Since the harmonic mean \(h\) is not less than the minimum \(m\) of the odd iterates of \(T\), Lemma 148 is a weaker version of Theorem \(4.1\) in Rozier–Terracol.

Lemma 149

Let \(j, q, m \in \mathbb {N}\) with \(j {\gt} 0\) and \(m {\gt} 0\). Suppose the following inequalities hold for the rationals \(3^q/2^j\) and \((3+1/m)^q/2^j\):

\begin{equation} 1 - \frac{3^q}{2^j} {\gt} 0 \quad \text{and} \quad 1 - \frac{3^q}{2^j} \le \frac{(3 + 1/m)^q - 3^q}{2^j}. \end{equation}
26

Then the ratio \(q/j\) satisfies:

\begin{equation} \frac{\log 2}{\log (3 + 1/m)} \le \frac{q}{j} {\lt} \frac{\log 2}{\log 3}. \end{equation}
27

Proof

For the upper bound, \(1 - 3^q/2^j {\gt} 0\) implies \(3^q {\lt} 2^j\). Taking logs gives \(q \log 3 {\lt} j \log 2\), so \(q/j {\lt} \log 2 / \log 3\). For the lower bound, the second inequality implies \(2^j - 3^q \le (3+1/m)^q - 3^q\), which simplifies to \(2^j \le (3+1/m)^q\). Taking logs gives \(j \log 2 \le q \log (3+1/m)\), yielding the final result.

Corollary 150

Let \((j, n)\) be a paradoxical sequence starting at \(n {\gt} 0\). Let \(m {\gt} 0\) be a lower bound for all odd iterates \(T^i(n)\) with \(i {\lt} j\). Let \(q\) be the number of odd steps. Then:

\begin{equation} \frac{\log 2}{\log (3 + 1/m)} \le \frac{q}{j} {\lt} \frac{\log 2}{\log 3}. \end{equation}
28

Proof

This follows from Lemma 148 and the algebraic properties derived in Lemma 149.

Since the harmonic mean \(h\) is not less than the minimum \(m\) of the odd iterates of \(T\), Lemma 150 is a weaker version of Corollary \(4.2\) in Rozier–Terracol.

Lemma 151

For any \(j \ge 2\) and any \(k \in \mathbb {N}\), the value \(j \cdot \log 2 / \log 3\) is not an integer:

\begin{equation} \frac{j \log 2}{\log 3} \neq k. \end{equation}
29

Proof

If \(j \log 2 / \log 3 = k\), then \(\xi = \log 2 / \log 3 = k/j \in \mathbb {Q}\), contradicting the irrationality of \(\xi \) (Lemma 135).

Lemma 152

For any \(j \ge 2\), the floor of \(j \log 2 / \log 3\) is strictly less than \(j \log 2 / \log 3\):

\begin{equation} \left\lfloor \frac{j \log 2}{\log 3} \right\rfloor {\lt} \frac{j \log 2}{\log 3}. \end{equation}
30

Proof

By definition, \(\lfloor x \rfloor \le x\). The floor must be strictly less because \(j \log 2 / \log 3\) is not an integer by Lemma 151.

Lemma 153

Let \(j, q, m \in \mathbb {N}\) with \(j, q, m {\gt} 0\). Suppose the ratio bounds

\begin{equation} \frac{\log 2}{\log (3 + 1/m)} \le \frac{q}{j} {\lt} \frac{\log 2}{\log 3} \end{equation}
31

hold. Then:

  1. \(2^{j/q} - 3 {\gt} 0\), i.e., \(2^{j/q} {\gt} 3\);

  2. \(m \le \dfrac {1}{2^{j/q} - 3}\).

Proof

The upper bound \(q/j {\lt} \log 2 / \log 3\) implies \(q \log 3 {\lt} j \log 2\), hence \(\log 3 {\lt} (j/q) \log 2 = \log (2^{j/q})\), so \(2^{j/q} {\gt} 3\).

The lower bound \(\log 2 / \log (3+1/m) \le q/j\) implies \(j \log 2 \le q \log (3+1/m)\), i.e., \((j/q)\log 2 \le \log (3+1/m)\), so \(2^{j/q} \le 3 + 1/m\). This gives \(2^{j/q} - 3 \le 1/m\), and since \(2^{j/q} - 3 {\gt} 0\), we can take reciprocals (reversing the inequality) to get \(m \le 1/(2^{j/q} - 3)\).

Let \(j, q, m \in \mathbb {N}\) with \(j \ge 2\) and \(m {\gt} 0\). Suppose the ratio bounds of Lemma 149 hold for \(q/j\). Define:

\begin{equation} r = \frac{j}{\left\lfloor j \log 2 / \log 3 \right\rfloor }. \end{equation}
32

Then \(2^r - 3 {\gt} 0\) and \(m \le 1/(2^r - 3)\).

Proof

From \(q \le \lfloor j \log 2/\log 3 \rfloor \) (by the upper bound \(q {\lt} j \log 2/\log 3\)), we have \(r = j/\lfloor j \log 2/\log 3 \rfloor \le j/q\). This means \(2^r \le 2^{j/q}\), so \(1/(2^r - 3) \ge 1/(2^{j/q} - 3)\). By Lemma 153, \(m \le 1/(2^{j/q}-3) \le 1/(2^r - 3)\).

To show \(2^r {\gt} 3\): since \(\lfloor j\log 2/\log 3 \rfloor {\lt} j \log 2/\log 3\) (strictly, by Lemma 152), \(r = j/\lfloor j\log 2/\log 3 \rfloor {\gt} j/(j\log 2/\log 3) = \log 3/\log 2\). Therefore \(r \log 2 {\gt} \log 3\), i.e., \(\log (2^r) {\gt} \log 3\), so \(2^r {\gt} 3\).

Corollary 155

Let \((j, n)\) be a paradoxical pair with \(j \ge 2\) and \(n {\gt} 0\). Let \(m {\gt} 0\) be a lower bound for all odd iterates \(T^k(n)\) with \(k {\lt} j\). Define \(r = j / \lfloor j \log 2 / \log 3 \rfloor \). Then:

\begin{equation} 2^r - 3 {\gt} 0 \quad \text{and} \quad m \le \frac{1}{2^r - 3}. \end{equation}
33

Proof

Combine the ratio bounds from Lemma 150 with Lemma 154.

Since the harmonic mean \(h\) is not less than the minimum \(m\) of the odd iterates of \(T\), Lemma 155 is weaker than Corollary \(4.3\) in Rozier–Terracol.